top of page
Writer's pictureShiri Septon - Etchin

EXPLORING PUBLIC SHELL COMAPNIES AS AN IPO ALTERNATIVE

Updated: Nov 20



Infographic comparing the advantages and disadvantages of going public through a Public Shell Company versus a traditional IPO, highlighting key factors such as timing flexibility, cost efficiency, and market perception

In recent years, public shell companies have become an attractive option for businesses looking to enter the capital markets swiftly and efficiently. These are public companies with little or no active business operations, set up specifically to merge with a private company that is actively operating. This approach is often considered an alternative to the traditional IPO process, offering both advantages and potential drawbacks.


What is a Public Shell Company?

A public shell company is a public entity that has ceased active business operations and is awaiting a merger with a private company. By acquiring a public shell, the private company can significantly shorten the complex IPO process to go public, using the shell’s existing stock listing.


Advantages and Disadvantages of a Shell Merger vs. an IPO


Advantages:

  1. Quick Access to Capital Markets: Public shells provide an accelerated route to the capital markets compared to IPOs, which can take a long time and face regulatory obstacles that could hinder completion.

  2. Timing Flexibility: Unlike an IPO, which needs to be timed to align with favourable macroeconomic and market conditions, a shell merger can be executed at almost any time, removing the dependency on market timing.

  3. Customizable Deal Structure: Shell mergers allow for adaptable structuring, enabling negotiation on terms such as valuation, ownership percentages, performance milestones, and price adjustment mechanisms, like earnouts.

  4. Cost Savings: Shell mergers are generally more affordable than IPOs, with lower associated legal, regulatory, and underwriting expenses.


Disadvantages:

  1. No Roadshow: Going public through a shell skips the traditional roadshow, a critical marketing step where companies introduce themselves to institutional investors. This can make future capital-raising efforts more challenging.

  2. Shareholder Dilution Risk: Public shells typically come with existing shareholders, which could dilute the control of new owners.

  3. Liquidity Limitations: Many public shells trade on secondary markets or have limited liquidity, making it difficult to attract new investors and raise capital efficiently. Companies should be aware of any trading restrictions and ensure they meet stock exchange requirements within the designated timeframe.

  4. Market Sentiment: While shell mergers have gained a more positive view in recent years, the perception of them as speculative still lingers. This could lead to stock price volatility post-merger, impacting market value and liquidity.


Types of Companies Suited for a Public Shell Merger

Shell mergers are particularly well-suited for companies with certain characteristics, such as:

  • High-Growth Companies: Shell mergers are often a good fit for rapidly growing companies seeking immediate capital access to support expansion.

  • Innovative Sectors: Companies in dynamic fields, such as technology and biotechnology, often require fast capital access to stay competitive and fuel product development.

  • Real Estate and Renewable Energy Companies: Asset-backed companies in these sectors, offering long-term cash flows and requiring substantial funding for project development, may appeal to investors and benefit from immediate market access.

  • Stable Business Models: Profitable, stable companies that struggle to meet IPO requirements but wish to raise capital for growth may find shell mergers an attractive option.


Conversely, large, established companies with significant public visibility may prefer an IPO, which can provide greater exposure, prestige, and opportunities for substantial capital raising.


Comparing the IPO Process and a Shell Merger


Initial Public Offering (IPO): In an IPO, the company prepares a prospectus detailing its operations, business, and strategic plans. This prospectus is submitted to the securities authority for approval, often going through several rounds of revisions. After regulatory approval, the company also needs stock exchange approval, which involves fulfilling requirements related to equity, share distribution, and more. This process can be lengthy, costly, and occasionally unsuccessful due to various factors.


Merger with a Public Shell: The shell merger process is generally shorter and involves a "reverse merger," where the public shell acquires the private company. In exchange, the private company shareholders receive shares in the public entity. Since the shell is already listed and has completed regulatory processes, the transaction requires fewer approvals. The company prepares a “business description” instead of a full prospectus, and although regulatory scrutiny of these deals has increased recently, the process is still faster and more cost-effective than an IPO.


In Conclusion

Public shell companies offer a creative and efficient path for companies seeking fast entry to the capital markets. However, they come with potential downsides and risks that should be considered when making financial and strategic decisions. When evaluating whether to go public via an IPO or a shell, companies should carefully assess their growth stage, industry, strategic goals, and long-term objectives. Consulting financial and business experts can help companies make an informed decision, maximizing their potential success in the capital market. For tailored guidance and expertise, contact us at Geminum to explore the best pathway for your business growth.

bottom of page